Publication Details

Date Published

March 14, 2022

Authors

Guillermo Rodríguez-Guzmán

Susannah Hume

Dr. Peter Mackie

Chiamaka Nwosu

Hannah Piggott

James White

Funded by

ESRC and Centre for Homelessness Impact

Report Type

Article

Subject Area

Other

Key References

Bastagli, F., Hagen-Zanker, J., Harman, L., et al. (2016). Cash Transfers: What Does the Evidence Say? A Rigorous Review of Programme Impact. Overseas Development Institute. https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/11316.pdf


White, H., Saran, A., Verma, A., & Verma, K. (2020). The Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve the Welfare of those Experiencing and at Risk of Homelessness: An Updated Evidence and Gap Map. Centre for Homelessness Impact.


Teixeira, L. & Cartwright, J. (Eds.) (2020). Using Evidence to End Homelessness. Bristol: Policy Press.


Foundations for Social Change (2021). Taking Bold Action on Homelessness. New Leaf Project findings. https://www.in.gr/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/CanadaHomeless.pdf


Keenan, C., Miller, S., Hanratty, J., et al. (2021). Accommodation-Based Interventions for Individuals Experiencing, or At Risk of Experiencing, Homelessness. Campbell Systematic Reviews 17(2). DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1165

Share This Project

European Journal of Homelessness: Accelerating Learning: the First Randomised Controlled Trials

Outline of the study

This groundbreaking paper documents the first randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in UK homelessness policy. This marked a historic shift toward evidence-based practice and addresses a critical gap in the UK evidence base, which previously represented less than 7% of global effectiveness studies carried out globally on homelessness interventions.

The paper reflects on three pioneering RCT studies launched by the Centre for Homelessness Impact and academic partners: the Personal Futures Grants provided £2,000 cash transfers to people in temporary accommodation; Homefinder UK supported voluntary out-of-area moves; Moving On compared the impact of settled versus temporary accommodation during COVID-19.


Findings in brief:
  • There are very significant evidence gaps in relation to homelessness interventions. 70% of homelessness intervention categories have been evaluated fewer than 10 times and most remain untested. Commonly used approaches like soup runs and reconnections lack robust causal evidence of their effectiveness ‍

  • International evidence from 165 studies across 56 programmes globally indicates the benefits of cash transfers in terms of improving household expenditure, education, health and nutrition

  • The three studies demonstrate the feasibility of conducting RCTs in relation to homelessness interventions . However, they also highlight potential implementation barriers around recruiting local authorities to participate in RCTs and frontline staff reservations about randomisation and operational issues.‍

Recommendations in brief:
  • Invest in relationships within the homelessness sector, to understand challenges and realities of working with people experiencing homelessness and to identify promising practice and harness opportunities
  • Build capacity in the academic sector - combining local and international homelessness expertise and learning, to adapt and test interventions in UK contexts
  • Continue to explore and address ethical considerations relating to RCTs ‍

  • Explore strategies to increase recruitment and retention in RCTs. This will include engaging and securing buy-in from staff at all levels of organisations
  • Develop locally appropriate data collection tools and processes suited to UK homelessness systems. ‍

Related content

Data visualisations

No items found.
Cite this paper

Rodriguez-Guzman, G., Hume, S., Mackie, P., Nwosu, C., Piggot, H., & White, J. (2021). Accelerating Learning – Lessons and Reflections from the First Randomised Controlled Trials in Homelessness in the UK. European Journal of Homelessness, 15(3), 171-185. www.homelessnessimpact.org/publication/european-journal-of-homelessness-accelerating-learning-the-first-randomised-controlled-trials